I definitely agree with Mr. Robinson. Intelligence is more than a perfect score on the SAT or a 4.0 GPA. It is being educated in a diverse array of subjects, being dynamic in the choices you make, and being distinct in who you are and who you wish to become. We can't mold adolescents into the "ideal student" and expect them to go on and succeed in life the way we view succession. Succeeding is different for everyone and we, as a society, should embrace that.
Mr. Robinson really put into perspective for me the impact that our schools have on us as individuals. We have come to value our education so much that it is the driving force behind everything. I don't necessarily believe that this is a bad thing, but I do believe that education allows for diversity, and it is up to our school systems to acknowledge that. We should be given the opportunity to succeed the way we have been created to succeed, whether this is through academics, art, music, dance, or drama. We still need to value our education, but we need to do so in its entirety not just in its ability to classify us all ass proficient according to state standards.
"If you're not willing to take a chance to be wrong, you will never create anything original." -Ken Robinson
1 comment:
David Warlick is a well-known guy when it comes to reform in education. I coincidentally read one of his latest post right before I read yours. He references a report from the Center for Educational Policy on time spent on the different subject areas since the implementation of NCLB. There are interesting stats that fit well with your ideas of educating the whole student and how schools area leaning away from encouraging students to be successful in multiple ways.
Link to Warlicks blog, which links to the document: http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1364
Post a Comment